Tag: Together

Using “box shadows” and clip-path together

Let’s do a little step-by-step of a situation where you can’t quite do what seems to make sense, but you can still get it done with CSS trickery. In this case, it’ll be applying a shadow to a shape.

You make a box

.tag {   background: #FB8C00;   color: #222;   font: bold 32px system-ui;   padding: 2rem 3rem 2rem 4rem; }

You fashion it into a nice tag shape

You use clip-path because it’s great for that.

.tag {   /* ... */   clip-path: polygon(30px 0%, 100% 0%, 100% 100%, 30px 100%, 0 50%) }

You want a shadow on it, so you…

Try to use box-shadow.

.tag {   /* ... */   box-shadow: 5px 5px 10px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5); }

But it doesn’t work. Nothing shows up. You think you’re going crazy. You assume you have the syntax wrong. You don’t. The problem is that clip-path is cutting it off.

You can drop-shadow a parent element instead

There is a filter that does shadows as well: drop-shadow(). But you can’t use it directly on the element because the clip-path will cut it off as well. So you make a parent:

<span class="tag-wrap">   <span class="tag">     Tag   </span> </span>

You can’t use box-shadow on that parent either, because the parent is still a rectangle and the shadow will look wrong. But you can use filter, and the shadow will follow the shape.

See the Pen
Shadow on Shape
by Chris Coyier (@chriscoyier)
on CodePen.

That’s all.

The post Using “box shadows” and clip-path together appeared first on CSS-Tricks.


, , , ,

Piecing Together Approaches for a CSS Masonry Layout

Masonry layout, on the web, is when items of an uneven size are laid out such that there aren’t uneven gaps. I would guess the term was coined (or at least popularized) for the web by David DeSandro because of his popular Masonry JavaScript library, which has been around since 2010.

JavaScript library. Nothing against JavaScript, but it’s understandable we might not want to lean on it for doing layout. Is there anything we can do in CSS directly these days? Sorta.

Is vertical order with ragged bottoms OK?

If it is, then CSS columns will do just fine.

See the Pen Masonry with Columns by Chris Coyier (@chriscoyier) on CodePen.

Flexbox can do vertical columns with ragged endings too

But it’s not quite as clever, because you’ll need to set a height of some kind to get it to wrap the columns. You’ll also have to be explicit about widths rather than having it decide columns for you.

But it’s doable and it does auto space the gaps if there is room.

See the Pen Masonry with Flexbox by Chris Coyier (@chriscoyier) on CodePen.

Do you need a clean bottom edge? A Flexbox/JavaScript combo can help.

Jamie Perkins originally wrote this, then Janosh Riebesell re-wrote it and, now I’m porting it here.

It totally messes with the order and requires the children to be flexy about their height, but it does the trick:

See the Pen Masonry with Flexbox + JS by Chris Coyier (@chriscoyier) on CodePen.

Is horizontal line masonry OK?

If it’s just the uneven brick-like look you’re after, then horizontal masonry is way easier. You could probably even float stuff if you don’t care about the ragged edge. If you wanna keep it a block… flexbox with allowed flex-grow is the ticket.

See the Pen Masonry with Flexbox + JS by Chris Coyier (@chriscoyier) on CodePen.

You’d think CSS grid could help

CSS grid is very amazing and useful in a CSS developer’s everyday life, but it’s not really designed for masonry style layouts. CSS grid is about defining lines and placing things along those lines, where masonry is about letting elements end where they may, but still exerting some positional influence.

Balázs Sziklai has a nice example of auto-flowing grids that all stack together nicely, with pretty good horiziontal ordering:

See the Pen True Masonry with Grid Layout by Balázs Sziklai (@balazs_sziklai) on CodePen.

But you can see how strict the lines are. There is a way though!

Grid + JavaScript-maniplated row spans

Andy Barefoot wrote up a great guide. The trick is setting up repeating grid rows that are fairly short, letting the elements fall into the grid horizontally as they may, then adjusting their heights to match the grid with some fairly light math to calculate how many rows they should span.

See the Pen CSS Grid Masonry (Step 10) by Andy Barefoot (@andybarefoot) on CodePen.

DOM-shifted elements in a CSS columns layout

What people generally want is column-stacking (varied heights on elements), but with horizontal ordering. That last grid demo above handles it pretty well, but it’s not the only way.

Jesse Korzan tackled it with CSS columns. It needs JavaScript as well to get it done. In this case, it shifts the elements in the DOM to order them left-to-right while providing a horizontal stack using a CSS columns layout. This introduces a bit of an accessibility problem since the visual order (left-to-right) and source order (top-to-bottom) are super different & dash; though perhaps fixable with programmatic tabindex?

There’s also the original library

Float away, my pretties.

See the Pen Masonry with Masonry by Chris Coyier (@chriscoyier) on CodePen.

The post Piecing Together Approaches for a CSS Masonry Layout appeared first on CSS-Tricks.


, , , ,

Fighting FOIT and FOUT Together

Lots from Divya with the setup:

There are 2 kinds of problems that can arise when using webfonts; Flash of invisible text (FOIT) and Flash of Unstyled Text (FOUT) … If we were to compare them, FOUT is of course the lesser of the two evils

If you wanna fight FOIT, the easiest tool is the font-display CSS property. I like the optional value because I generally dislike the look of fonts swapping.

If you want to fight them both, one option is to preload the fonts:

<link rel="preload" href="/fonts/awesome-l.woff2" as="font" />


Preload is your friend, but not like your best friend … preloading in excess can significantly worsen performance, since preloads block initial render.

Just like CSS does.

Even huge sites aren’t doing much about font loading perf. Roel Nieskens:

I expected major news sites to be really conscious about the fonts they use, and making sure everything is heavily optimised. Turns out a simple Sunday afternoon of hacking could save a lot of data: we could easily save roughly 200KB

Fonts are such big part of web perf, so let’s get better at it! Here’s Zach Leatherman at the Performance.now() conference:

Part of the story is that we might just have lean on JavaScript to do the things we need to do. Divya again:

Web fonts are primarily CSS oriented. It can therefore feel like bad practice to reach for JavaScript to solve a CSS issue, especially since JavaScript is a culprit for an ever increasing page weight.

But sometimes you just have to do it in order to get what you need done. Perhaps you’d like to handle page visibility yourself? Here’s Divya’s demonstration snippet:

const font = new fontFace("My Awesome Font", "url(/fonts/my-awesome-font.woff2)" format('woff2')")   font.load().then (() => {     document.fonts.add(font);     document.body.style.fontFamily = "My Awesome Font, serif";      // we can also control visibility of the page based on a font loading //     var content = document.getElementById("content");     content.style.visibility = "visible";     })

But there are a bunch of other reasons. Zach has documented them:

  • Because, as you load in fonts, each of them can cause repaints and you want to group them.
  • Because the user has indicated they want to use less data or reduce motion.
  • Because you’d like to be kind to slow networks.
  • Because you’re using a third-party that can’t handle font-display.

The post Fighting FOIT and FOUT Together appeared first on CSS-Tricks.


, , ,