Tag: items

How to Add Commas Between a List of Items Dynamically with CSS

Imagine you have a list of items. Say, fruit: Banana, Apple, Orange, Pear, Nectarine

We could put those commas (,) in the HTML, but let’s look at how we could do that in CSS instead, giving us an extra level of control. We’ll make sure that last item doesn’t have a comma while we’re at it.

I needed this for a real project recently, and part of the requirements were that any of the items in the list could be hidden/revealed via JavaScript. The commas needed to work correctly no matter which items were currently shown.

One solution I found rather elegant solution is using general sibling combinator. We’ll get to that in a minute. Let’s start with some example HTML. Say you start out with a list of fruits:

<ul class="fruits">   <li class="fruit on">Banana</li>   <li class="fruit on">Apple</li>   <li class="fruit on">Orange</li>   <li class="fruit on">Pear</li>   <li class="fruit on">Nectarine</li> </ul>

And some basic CSS to make them appear in a list:

.fruits {   display: flex;   padding-inline-start: 0;   list-style: none; }  .fruit {   display: none; /* hidden by default */ }  .fruit.on { /* JavaScript-added class to reveal list items */   display: inline-block; }

Now say things happen inside this interface, like a user toggles controls that filter out all fruits that grow in cold climates. Now a different set of fruits is shown, so the fruit.on class is manipulated with the classList API.

So far, our HTML and CSS would create a list like this:

BananaOrangeNectarine

Now we can reach for that general sibling combinator to apply a comma-and-space between any two on elements:

.fruit.on ~ .fruit.on::before {   content: ', ';  }

Nice!

You might be thinking: why not just apply commas to all the list items and remove it from the last with something like :last-child or :last-of-type. The trouble with that is the last child might be “off” at any given time. So what we really want is the last item that is “on,” which isn’t easily possible in CSS, since there is nothing like “last of class” available. Hence, the general sibling combinator trick!

In the UI, I used max-width instead of display and toggled that between 0 and a reasonable maximum value so that I could use transitions to push items on and off more naturally, making it easier for the user to see which items are being added or removed from the list. You can add the same effect to the pseudo-element as well to make it super smooth.

Here’s a demo with a couple of examples that are both slight variations. The fruits example uses a hidden class instead of on, and the veggies example has the animations. SCSS is also used here for the nesting:

I hope this helps others looking for something similar!


The post How to Add Commas Between a List of Items Dynamically with CSS appeared first on CSS-Tricks.

You can support CSS-Tricks by being an MVP Supporter.

CSS-Tricks

, , , ,

Making width and flexible items play nice together

The short answer: flex-shrink and flex-basis are probably what you’re lookin’ for.

The long answer

Let’s say you want to align an image and some text next to each other with like this:

A small image of a yellow illustrated bird to the left of a block of text.

Now let’s say you reach for flexbox to make it happen. Setting the parent element to display: flex; is a good first start.

.container {    display: flex;  }

And this results in…

See the Pen
Flex-Shrink Example 1
by Robin Rendle (@robinrendle)
on CodePen.

Yikes! Well, that’s kinda okay, I guess. It makes sense that the image would bump right up against the text like that because we haven’t set a width on the image. Ideally, though, we’d like that image to have a fixed width and then the text should take up whatever space is left over.

Okay, so let’s go do that!

.container {    display: flex;  }  img {    width: 50px;   margin-right: 20px;  }

See the Pen
Flex-Shrink Example 2
by Robin Rendle (@robinrendle)
on CodePen.

This looks great in Chrome. But wait, what? If we inspect the image tag in Firefox DevTools, we’ll find that it’s not the width value that we set at all:

We could use min-width to force the image to the 50px width we want:

img {   min-width: 50px;   margin-right: 20px; }

Buuuuuuut, that only sets helps with the width so we’ve got to put a margin in as well.

img {   min-width: 50px;   margin-right: 20px; }

There we go. That’s better in Firefox and still works in Chrome.

The even longer answer

I realized the image is getting the squished treatment because we need to use the flex-shrink property to tell flex items not to decrease in size, regardless of whether or not they have a width.

All flex-items have a flex-shrink value of 1. We need to set the image element to 0:

.container {    display: flex;  }  img {   width: 50px;   margin-right: 20px;   flex-shrink: 0; }

See the Pen
Flex-Shrink Example 3
by Robin Rendle (@robinrendle)
on CodePen.

Getting better! But we can still do more to improve this.

The director’s cut answer

We can tidy things up further because flex-shrink is included in the flex shorthand property.

flex: none | [ <'flex-grow'> <'flex-shrink'>? || <'flex-basis'> ]

If we set the flex-shrink value to 0 and the flex-basis value to the default width we want the image to be, then we can get rid of the width property altogether.

.container {    display: flex;  }  img {   flex: 0 0 50px;   margin-right: 20px; }

Oh yeah:

See the Pen
Flex-Shrink Example 2
by Geoff Graham (@geoffgraham)
on CodePen.

Another example

That flex-shrink property solves a ton of other problems and is pretty dang important if you want to start using flexbox. Here’s another example why: I stumbled upon yet another problem like the one above and I mentioned it in a recent edition of the newsletter. I was building a navigation component that would let users scroll left and right through multiple items. I noticed the following problem when checking my work:

See the Pen
flex-shrink nav item 1
by Robin Rendle (@robinrendle)
on CodePen.

That longer navigation item shouldn’t break into multiple lines like that — but I finally understood why this was happening, thanks to the previous issue. If you set the flex-shrink property to 0 then it will tell each item in this navigation not to shrink and instead assume the width of the content instead, like this:

See the Pen
flex-shrink nav item
by Robin Rendle (@robinrendle)
on CodePen.

And, yes, we can go the extra step once again to use the flex property instead, this time using auto as the flex-basis since we want the maximum amount of space for all items to be considered when divvying up space in the navigation container.

See the Pen
Setting flex for flexible nav elements
by Geoff Graham (@geoffgraham)
on CodePen.

Huzzah! We figured it out. Even though the answer is a single line of code, it’s is pretty essential one to making truly flexible elements.

CSS-Tricks

, , , , , ,
[Top]