Tag: Frontend

A Site for Front-End Development Conferences (Built with 11ty on Netlify)

I built a new little site! It’s a site for listing upcoming conferences in the world of front-end web design and development. In years past (like 2017), Sarah Drasner took up this daunting job. We used a form for new conference submissions, but it was still a rather manual task of basically manually editing a blog post. I wanted to keep doing this, as I think it’s valuable to have a simple reference page for conferences in our niche slice of the web, but I wanted the site to be able to live on year after year with lower maintenance-related technical debt.

So this is what I did!

I wanted to get it on GitHub.

So I put it there. Part of the beauty of GitHub is that it opens up the idea of collaboration through pull requests to really anyone in the world. You need to have a GitHub account, but that’s free, and you need to understand Git at least on some minor level (which is a barrier that I’d like to resolve in time), but it invites more collaboration than something like just asking people to email you content and ideas.

I wanted the content in Markdown in the Repo.

The Front Matter format, which is Markdown with some data the the top, is such a useful and approachable format. You need almost zero knowledge, not even HTML, to be able to create/edit a file like this:

Having the actual conference data in the repo means that pull requests aren’t just for design or features; more commonly, they will be for actual conference data. The work of making this site full of all the best conferences is the work of all of us, not just one of us.

At the time of this writing there have already been 30 closed pull requests.

I used 11ty to build the site.

11ty is almost fascinatingly simple. It looks in one directory for what it needs to process or move to another directory. It supports my favorite templating system out of the box: Nunjucks. Plus front matter Markdown like I mentioned above.

I was able to essentially design a card that displays the data we get from the Markdown files, and then build the homepage of the site by looping over those Markdown files and applying the templated card.

11ty is based on Node.js, so while I did have some learning-curve moments, it was comfortable for me to work in. There definitely is configuration for doing the things I wanted to be doing. For example, this is how I had to make a “collection” of conferences in order to loop over them:

config.addCollection("conferences", function(collection) {   let allConferences = collection.getFilteredByGlob("site/conferences/*.md");   let futureConferences = allConferences.filter(conf => {     return conf.data.date >= new Date();   });   return futureConferences; });

The site is hosted on Netlify.

One reason to use Netlify here is that it’s incredibly easy. I made a site site in Netlify by connecting it to the GitHub repo. I told it how to build the site (it’s a single command: eleventy) and where the built site files are (dist), and that’s it. In fact, that’s even part of the repo:

Now whenever I push to the master branch (or accept a pull request into master), the site automatically rebuilds and deploys. Just takes seconds. It’s really amazing.

Better, for each pull request, Netlify makes sure everything is in order first:

My favorite is the deploy preview. It gives you an (obscure) URL that will literally last forever (immutable) and that serves as a look at the built version of this site with that pull request.

So, not only is it extremely easy to use Netlify, but I get a bunch of stuff for free, like the fact that the site is smokin’ fast on their CDNs and such.

I’m also excited that I’ve barely tapped into Netlify’s features here, so there is a lot of stuff I can dig into over time. And I intend to!

I use Zapier to re-build the site every day.

There is a bit of a time-sensitive nature to this site. The point of this site is to reference it for upcoming conferences. It’s less interesting to see past conferences (although maybe we can have a browse-able archive in the future). I like the idea of ripping off past conferences for the homepage. If this was PHP (or whatever), we could do that at runtime, but this is a static site (on purpose). Doing something like this at build time is no big deal (see that code snippet above that only returns conferences past today’s date). But we can’t just waiting around for pull requests to re-build the site, nor do I want to make it a manual thing I need to do every day.

Fortunately, this is easy as pie with Zapier:

Phil Hawksworth took this to the extreme once and built a clock website that rebuilds every minute.

This site wasn’t just an experiment. I’d like to keep it going! If you’re part of running a conference, I’m quite sure it doesn’t hurt to add it to add yours, just so long as it has an enforcable and actionable Code of Conduct, and is within the world of front-end web design and development.

The post A Site for Front-End Development Conferences (Built with 11ty on Netlify) appeared first on CSS-Tricks.


, , , , , ,

STAR Apps: A New Generation of Front-End Tooling for Development Workflows

Product teams from AirBnb and New York Times to Shopify and Artsy (among many others) are converging on a new set of best practices and technologies for building the web apps that their businesses depend on. This trend reflects core principles and solve underlying problems that we may share, so it is worth digging deeper.

Some of that includes:

Naming things is hard, and our industry has struggled to name this new generation of tooling for web apps. The inimitable Orta Theroux calls it an Omakase; I slimmed it down and opted for a simpler backronym pulled from letters in the tooling outlined above: STAR (Design Systems, TypeScript, Apollo, and React).


, , , , , ,

What makes someone a good front-end developer?

We recently covered this exact same thing, but from the perspective of a bunch of developers.

Chris Ferdinandi weighs in:

The least important skills for a front-end developer to have are technical ones.

The nuances of JavaScript. How to use a particular library, framework, or build tool. How the cascade in CSS works. Semantic HTML. Fizz-buzz.

Chris takes that a little farther than I would. I do think that with an understanding of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, the deeper the better, and that it is an ingredient in making a good front-end developer. But I also agree it’s much more than that. In fact, with solid foundational skills and really good soft skills (e.g. you’re great at facilitating a brainstorming meeting), you could and should get a job before they even look at your language skills.

Direct Link to ArticlePermalink

The post What makes someone a good front-end developer? appeared first on CSS-Tricks.


, , , ,

The All Powerful Front-End Developer

I posted a video of this talk some months back, but it was nearly an hour and a half long. Here’s an updated version that I gave at JAMstack_conf that’s only 30 minutes:

The gist is that the front-end stack is wildly powerful these days. Our front-end skillset can be expanded to give us power to do back-end-ish things and talk with APIs that allow us to build entire products in a way we haven’t quite been able to before.

The post The All Powerful Front-End Developer appeared first on CSS-Tricks.


, ,

Front-End Developers Have to Manage the Loading Experience

Web performance is a huge complicated topic. There are metrics like total requests, page weight, time to glass, time to interactive, first input delay, etc. There are things to think about like asynchronous requests, render blocking, and priority downloading. We often talk about performance budgets and performance culture.

How that first document comes down from the server is a hot topic. That is where most back-end related performance talk enters the picture. It gives rise to architectures like the JAMstack, where gosh, at least we don’t have to worry about index.html being slow.

Images have a performance story all to themselves (formats! responsive images!). Fonts also (FOUT’n’friends!). CSS also (talk about render blocking!). Service workers can be involved at every level. And, of course, JavaScript is perhaps the most talked about villain of performance. All of this is balanced with perhaps the most important general performance concept: perceived performance. Front-end developers already have a ton of stuff we’re responsible for regarding performance. 80% is the generally quoted number and that sounds about right to me.

For a moment, let’s assume we’re going to build a site and we’re not going to server-side render it. Instead, we’re going to load an empty document and kick off data API calls as quickly as we can, then render the site with that data. Not a terribly rare scenario these days. As you might imagine, >we now have another major concern: handling the loading experience.

I mused about this the other day. Here’s an example:

I’d say that loading experience is pretty janky, and I’m on about the best hardware and internet connection money can buy. It’s not a disaster and surely many, many thousands of people use this particular site successfully every day. That said, it doesn’t feel fast, smooth, or particularly nice like you’d think a high-budget website would in these Future Times.

Part of the reason is probably because that page isn’t server-side rendered. For whatever reason (we can’t really know from the outside), that’s not the way they went. Could be developer efficiency, security, a temporary state during a re-write… who knows! (It probably isn’t ignorance.)

What are we to do? Well, I think this is a somewhat new problem in front-end development. We’ve told the browser: “Hey, we got this. We’re gonna load things all out of order depending on when our APIs cough stuff up to us and our front-end framework decides it’s time to do so.” I can see the perspective here where this isn’t ideal and we’ve given up something that browsers are incredibly good at only to do it less well ourselves. But hey, like I’ve laid out a bit here, the world is complicated.

What is actually happening is that these front-end frameworks are aware of this issue and are doing things to help manage it. Back in April of this year, Dan Abramov introduced React Suspense. It seems like a tool for helping front-end devs like us manage the idea that we now need to deal with more loading state stuff than we ever have before:

At about 14 minutes, he gets into fetching data with placeholder components, caching and such. This issue isn’t isolated to React, of course, but keeping in that theme, here’s a conference talk by Andrew Clark that hit home with me even more quickly (but ultimately uses the same demo and such):

Just the idea of waiting to show spinners for a little bit can go a long way in de-jankifying loading.

Mikael Ainalem puts a point on this in a recent article, A Brief History of Flickering Spinners. He explains more clearly what I was trying to say:

One reason behind this development is the change we’ve seen in asynchronous programming. Asynchronous programming is a lot easier than it used to be. Most modern languages have good support for loading data on the fly. Modern JavaScript has incorporated Promises and with ES7 comes the async and await keywords. With the async/await keywords one can easily fetch data and process it when needed. This means that we need to think a step further about how we show users that data is loading.

Plus, he offers some solutions!

See the Pen Flickering spinners by Mikael Ainalem (@ainalem) on CodePen.

We’ve got to get better at this.

The post Front-End Developers Have to Manage the Loading Experience appeared first on CSS-Tricks.


, , , ,

Front-end development is not a problem to be solved

HTML and CSS are often seen as a burden.

This is a feeling I’ve noticed from engineers and designers I’ve worked with in the past, and it’s a sentiment that’s a lot more transparent with the broader web community at large. You can hear it in Medium posts and on indie blogs, whether in conversations about CSS, web performance, or design tools.

The sentiment is that front-end development is a problem to be solved: “if we just have the right tools and frameworks, then we might never have to write another line of HTML or CSS ever again!” And oh boy what a dream that would be, right?

Well, no, actually. I certainly don’t think that front-end development is a problem at all.

What’s behind this feeling? Well, designers want tools that let them draw pictures and export a batch of CSS and HTML files like Dreamweaver promised back in the day. On the other end, engineers don’t want to sweat accessibility, web performance or focus states among many, many other things. There’s simply too many edge cases, too many devices, and too many browsers to worry about. The work is just too much.

Consequently, I empathize with these feelings as a designer/developer myself, but I can’t help but get a little upset when I read about someone’s relationship with Bootstrap or design systems, frameworks or CSS-in-JS solutions — and even design tools like Sketch or Figma. It appears that we treat front-end development as a burden, or something we want to void altogether by abstracting it with layers of tools.

We should see front-end development as a unique skillset that is critical to the success of any project.

I believe that’s why frameworks and tools like Bootstrap are so popular; not necessarily because they’re a collection of helpful components, but a global solution that corrects an inherent issue. And when I begin to see “Bootstrap” in multiple resumés for front-end applications, I immediately assume that we’re going to be at odds with our approaches to design and development.

Bootstrap isn’t a skill though — front-end development is.

And this isn’t me just being a curmudgeon… I hope. I genuinely want tools that help us make better decisions, that help us build accessible, faster, and more beautiful websites in a way that pushes the web forward. That said, I believe the communities built up around these tools encourage designing and developing in a way that’s ignorant of front-end skills and standards.

What’s the point in learning about vanilla HTML, CSS and JavaScript if they wind up becoming transpiled by other tools and languages?

Don’t get me wrong — I don’t think there’s anything wrong with Bootstrap, or CSS-in-JS, or CSS Modules, or fancy design tools. But building our careers around the limitations of these tools is a minor tragedy. Front-end development is complex because design is complex. Transpiling our spoken language into HTML and CSS requires vim and nuance, and always will. That’s not going to be resolved by a tool but by diligent work over a long period of time.

I reckon HTML and CSS deserve better than to be processed, compiled, and spat out into the browser, whether that’s through some build process, app export, or gigantic framework library of stuff that we half understand. HTML and CSS are two languages that deserve our care and attention to detail. Writing them is a skill.

I know I’m standing on a metaphorical soapbox here, and perhaps I’m being a tad melodramatic, but front-end development is not a problem to be solved. It’s a cornerstone of the web, and it’s not going away any time soon.

Is it?

The post Front-end development is not a problem to be solved appeared first on CSS-Tricks.


, , ,