Tag: Could

What if you could cut your hosting costs by 80%? Webiny Serverless CMS makes it possible.

Are you hosting one or more websites and are using a headless CMS? Are you hosting your CMS on a virtual machine or a container, or using a SaaS solution? If so, then you’re paying for the uptime, regardless if the server or service is serving requests or not. Essentially, you are paying for stuff you are not using. And in this article look at how how you can change that and save up to 80% of your hosting cost along the way.

Serverless — what’s that about?

If you’re new to serverless, in short, serverless is set of services you’re consuming without worrying about the underlying infrastructure. There are services for compute, like AWS Lambda that allow you to run Node.js code, services for storage like S3, database as a service like DynamoDb and many others.

The benefits of serverless are:

  1. You are billed based on your consumption
  2. There are no servers for you to manage
  3. Services scale automatically
  4. Services are more secure than your regular server

Servers are still there, but they are abstracted away — out of sight, out of mind.

Out of all the benefits, the first one plays a big role. Picture an API on a regular server or a virtual machine. If that server is not handling a new request every few seconds, there is a lot of idle time where the server is not doing anything, but you’re still paying for it.

With serverless you pay per your consumption, if your API is not handling any request at that point in time, your cost is $ 0. To further back this case, a research made by Deloitte found that a larger system can save anywhere between 60-80% in infrastructure costs and up to 60% in management costs just by switching to serverless.

Although serverless sounds great, there is a down side to it. It’s quite complex and time consuming to create new solutions from scratch and existing solutions are not designed for such environments. This is where Webiny comes in.

Webiny Serverless CMS

To help you adopt serverless and build websites on top of this modern infrastructure, there is one solution you can use today, for free. Webiny Serverless CMS is an open source solution that comes with a few apps, including a GraphQL-based Headless CMS.

Some of its features:

  1. GraphQL API
  2. Content versioning and modeling through a UI
  3. Multi-tenancy & Multi-language support
  4. Powerful user access control
  5. Built-in image optimization and image editor
  6. Works with existing static page generators like Gatsby and others

It’s important to note that Webiny Serverless CMS is completely free and self-hosted — all you need is an AWS account.

The system is self-hosted on top of the AWS serverless offering, and your sites will benefit from it in the following ways:

  • High-availability and fault tolerance for your API
  • 99.999999999% (11 9’s) of data durability
  • Enterprise-grade secure and scalable ACL
  • Event-driven scalability — pay for what you use
  • Great performance using a global CDN
  • DDoS Protection of your APIs

All this is in the box and it takes less than 10 minutes to get up and running.

Comparing Webiny to other solutions on the market — this is what it looks like:

Get started with Webiny Serverless CMS and stop overpaying for your infrastructure.


The post What if you could cut your hosting costs by 80%? Webiny Serverless CMS makes it possible. appeared first on CSS-Tricks.

You can support CSS-Tricks by being an MVP Supporter.

CSS-Tricks

, , , , , ,

Could Grouping HTML Classes Make Them More Readable?

You can have multiple classes on an HTML element:

<div class="module p-2"></div>

Nothing incorrect or invalid there at all. It has two classes. In CSS, both of these will apply:

.module { } .p-2 { }
const div = document.querySelector("div"); console.log(div.classList.contains("module")); // true console.log(div.classList.contains("p-3"));    // false

But what about grouping them? All we have here is a space-separated string. Maybe that’s fine. But maybe we can make things more clear!

Years ago, Harry Roberts talked about grouping them. He wrapped groups of classes in square brackets:

<div class="[ foo  foo--bar ]  [ baz  baz--foo ]">

The example class names above are totally abstract just to demonstrate the grouping. Imagine they are like primary names and variations as one group, then utility classes as another group:

<header class="[ site-header site-header-large ]  [ mb-10 p-15 ]">

Those square brackets? Meaningless. Those are there to visually represent the groups to us developers. Technically, they are also classes, so if some sadist wrote .[ {}, it would do stuff in your CSS. But that’s so unlikely that, hopefully, the clarity from the groups outweighs it and is more helpful.

That example above groups the primary name and a variation in one group and some example utility classes in another group.

I’m not necessarily recommending that approach. They are simply groups of classes that you might have.

Here’s the same style of grouping, with different groups:

<button class="[ link-button ] [ font-base text-xs color-primary ] [ js-trigger ]" type="button" hidden>

That example has a single primary name, utility classes with different naming styles, and a third group for JavaScript specific selectors.

Harry wound up shunning this approach a few years ago, saying that the look of it was just too weird for the variety of people and teams he worked with. It caused enough confusion that the benefits of grouped classes weren’t worth it. He suggested line breaks instead:

<div class="media  media--large             testimonial  testimonial--main"> 

That seems similarly clear to me. The line breaks in HTML are totally fine. Plus, the browser will have no trouble with that and JSX is generally written with lots of line breaks in HTML anyway because of how much extra stuff is plopped onto elements in there, like event handlers and props.

Perhaps we combine the ideas of line breaks as separators and identified groups… with emojis!

See the Pen
Grouping Classes
by Chris Coyier (@chriscoyier)
on CodePen.

Weird, but fun. Emojis are totally valid there. Like the square brackets, they could also do things if someone wrote a class name for them, but that’s generally unlikely and something for a team to talk about.

Another thing I’ve seen used is data-* attributes for groups instead of classes, like…

<div    class="primary-name"   data-js="js-hook-1 js-hook-2"   data-utilities="padding-large" >

You can still select and style based on attributes in both CSS and JavaScript, so it’s functional, though slightly less convenient because of the awkward selectors like [data-js="js-hook-1"] and lack of convenient APIs like classList.

How about you? Do you have any other clever ideas for class name groups?

The post Could Grouping HTML Classes Make Them More Readable? appeared first on CSS-Tricks.

CSS-Tricks

, , , , , ,
[Top]

CSS Houdini Could Change the Way We Write and Manage CSS

CSS Houdini may be the most exciting development in CSS. Houdini is comprised of a number of separate APIs, each shipping to browsers separately, and some that have already shipped (here’s the browser support). The Paint API is one of them. I’m very excited about it and recently started to think about how I can use it in my work.

One way I’ve been able to do that is to use it as a way to avoid reinventing the wheel. We’ll go over that in this post while comparing it with methods we currently use in JavaScript and CSS. (I won’t dig into how to write CSS Houdini because there are great articles like this, this and this.)

Houdini brings modularity and configurations to CSS

The way CSS Houdini works brings two advantages: modularity and configurability. Both are common ways to make our lives as developers easier. We see these concepts often in the JavaScript world, but less-so with CSS world… until now.

Here’s a table the workflows we have for some use cases, comparing traditional CSS with using Houdini. I also added JavaScript for further comparison. You can see CSS Houdini allows us to use CSS more productively, similar to how the JavaScript world had evolved into components.

Traditional CSS CSS Houdini JavaScript
When we need a commonly used snippets Write it from scratch or copy-paste from somewhere. Import a worklet for it. Import a JS library.
Customize the snippet for the use case Manually tweak the value in CSS. Edit custom properties that the worklet exposes. Edit configs that the library provides.
Sharing code Share code for the raw styles, with comments on how to tweak each piece. Share the worklet (in the future, to a package management service) and document custom properties. Share the library to a package management service (like npm) and document how to use and configure it.

Modularity

With Houdini, you can import a worklet and start to use it with one line of code.

<script>   CSS.paintWorklet.addModule('my-useful-paint-worklet.js'); </script>

This means there’s no need to implement commonly used styles every time. You can have a collection of your own worklets which can be used on any of your projects, or even shared with each other.

If you’re looking for modularity for HTML and JavaScript in additional to styles, then web components is the solution.

It’s very similar to what we already have in the JavaScript world. Most people won’t re-implement commonly used functions, like throttling or deep-copying objects. We simply import libraries, like Lodash.

I can imagine we could have CSS Houdini package management services if the popularity of CSS Houdini takes off, and anyone could import worklets for interesting waterfall layouts, background patterns, complex animation, etc.

Configurability

Houdini works well with CSS variables, which largely empowers itself. With CSS variables, a Houdini worklet can be configured by the user.

.my-element {   background-image: paint(triangle);   --direction: top;   --size: 20px; }

In the snippet, --direction and --size are CSS variables, and they’re used in the triangle worklet (defined by the author of the triangle worklet). The user can change the property to update how it displays, even dynamically updating CSS variables in JavaScript.

If we compare it to what we already have in JavaScript again, JavaScript libraries usually have options that can be passed along. For example, we can pass values for speed, direction, size and so on to a carousel library to make it perform the way we want. Offering these APIs at the element level in CSS is very useful.

A Houdini workflow makes my development process much more efficient

Let’s see a complete example of how this whole thing can work together to make development easier. We’ll use a tooltip design pattern as an example. I find myself using this pattern often in different websites, yet somehow re-implement for each new project.

Let’s briefly walk through my old experience:

  1. OK, I need a tooltip.
  2. It’s a box, with a triangle on one side. I’ll use a pseudo-element to draw the triangle.
  3. I can use the transparent border trick to draw the triangle.
  4. At this time, I most likely dig up my past projects to copy the code. Let me think… this one needs to point up, which side is transparent?
  5. Oh, the design requires a border for the tooltip. I have to use another pseudo-element and fake a border for the pointing triangle.
  6. What? They decide to change the direction of the triangle?! OK, OK. I will tweak all the values of both triangles…

It’s not rocket science. The whole process may only take five minutes. But let’s see how it can be better with Houdini.

I built a simple worklet to draw a tooltip, with many options to change its looks. You can download it on GitHub.

Here’s my new process, thanks to Houdini:

  1. OK, I need a tooltip.
  2. I’ll import this tooltip worklet and use it.
  3. Now I’ll modify it using custom properties.
<div class="tooltip-1">This is a tip</div> <script>CSS.paintWorklet.addModule('my-tooltip-worklet.js')</script> <style> .tooltip-1 {   background-image: paint(tooltip);   padding: calc(var(--triangle-size) * 1px + .5em) 1em 1em;   --round-radius: 0;   --background-color: #4d7990;   --triangle-size: 20;   --position: 20;   --direction: top;   --border-color: #333;   --border-width: 2;   color: #fff; } </style>

Here’s a demo! Go ahead and play around with variables!

CSS Houdini opens a door to modularized, configurable styles sharing. I look forward to seeing developers using and sharing CSS Houdini worklets. I’m trying to add more useful examples of Houdini usage. Ping me if you have ideas, or want to contribute to this repo.

The post CSS Houdini Could Change the Way We Write and Manage CSS appeared first on CSS-Tricks.

CSS-Tricks

, , , ,
[Top]