An Event Apart Boston is almost here! We’re talking, like, less than a month away. If you’ve been holding off from registering, this might be your last chance because time and seating are both limited. Besides, we’re talking about three days of pure knowledge-dropping by an impressive lineup of speakers on a wide range of topics. Seriously, just look at the full schedule and prepare to be get stoked for a great time.
But, if a couple of weeks until show time is a little too tight for your liking, that’s where An Event Apart has you totally covered because there’s another one taking place in Washington D.C. this summer. And three more throughout the rest of the year in Chicago, Denver and San Francisco.
The reason an Event Apart is so near-and-dear to the CSS-Tricks family is that it scratches a common itch that we see come up around here often: how can we possibly stay on top of our careers as front-enders when our industry is changing at lightning speed and when we’re all-consumed trying to keep on top of our actual jobs? An Event Apart is our chance to take intention time away from the day-to-day and invest in our careers by learning from some of the best in the business, meeting folks who do what we do, and having those micro-interactions with others in the hallways that spark the interesting types of dialogues you just can’t get from Twitter.
I had so much fun at An Event Apart Seattle! There is something nice about sitting back and basking in the messages from a variety of such super smart people.
I didn’t take comprehensive notes of each talk, but I did jot down little moments that flickered my brain. I’ll post them here! Blogging is fun! Again, note that these moments weren’t necessarily the main point of the speaker’s presentation or reflective of the whole journey of the topic — they are little micro-memorable moments that stuck out to me.
Jeffrey Zeldman brought up the reading apps Instapaper (still around!) and Readability (not around… but the technology is what seeped into native browser tech). He called them a vanguard (cool word!) meaning they were warning us that our practices were pushing users away. This turned out to be rather true, as they still exist and are now joined by new technologies, like AMP and native reader mode, which are fighting the same problems.
Margot Bloomstein made a point about inconsistency eroding our ability to evaluate and build trust. Certainly applicable to websites, but also to a certain President of the United States.
Sarah Parmenter shared a powerful moment where she, through the power of email, reached out to Bloom and Wild, a flower mail delivery service, to tell them a certain type of email they were sending she found to be, however unintentionally, very insensitive. Sarah was going to use this as an example anyway, but the day before, Bloom and Wild actually took her advice and implemented a specialized opt-out system.
This not only made Sarah happy that a company could actually change their systems to be more sensitive to their customers, but it made a whole ton of people happy, as evidenced by an outpouring of positive tweets after it happened. Turns out your customers like it when you, ya know, think of them.
Eric Meyer covered one of the more inexplicable things about pseudo-elements: if you content: url(/icons/icon.png); you literally can’t control the width/height. There are ways around it, notably by using a background image instead, but it is a bit baffling that there is a way to add an image to a page with no possible way to resize it.
Literally, the entire talk was about pseudo-elements, which I found kinda awesome as I did that same thing eight years ago. If you’re looking for some nostalgia (and are OK with some cringe-y moments), here’s the PDF.
Eric also showed a demo that included a really neat effect that looks like a border going from thick to thin to thick again, which isn’t really something easily done on the web. He used a pseudo, but here it is as an <hr> element:
Rachel Andrew had an interesting way of talking about flexbox. To paraphrase:
Flexbox isn’t the layout method you think it is. Flexbox looks at some disparate things and returns some kind of reasonable layout. Now that grid is here it’s a lot more common to use that to be more much explict about what we are doing with layout. Not that flexbox isn’t extremely useful.
Rachel regularly pointed out that we don’t know how tall things are in web design, which is just so, so true. It’s always been true. The earlier we embrace that, the better off we’ll be. So much of our job is dealing with overflow.
Rachel brought up a concept that was new to me, in the sense that it has an official name. The concept is “data loss” through CSS. For example, aligning something a certain way might cause some content to become visually hidden and totally unreachable. Imagine some boxes like this, set in flexbox, with center alignment:
No “data loss” there because we can read everything. But let’s say we have more content in some of them. We can never know heights!
If that element was along the top of a page, for example, no scrollbar will be triggered because it’s opposite the scroll direction. We’d have “data loss” of that text:
We now alignment keywords that help with this. Like, we can still attempt to center, but we can save ourselves by using safe center (unsafe center being the default):
Rachel also mentioned overlapping as a thing that grid does better. Here’s a kinda bad recreation of what she showed:
I was kinda hoping to be able to do that without being as explicit as I am being there, but that’s as close as I came.
Jen Simmons showed us a ton of different scenarios involving both grid and flexbox. She made a very clear point that a grid item can be a flexbox container (and vice versa).
Perhaps the most memorable part is how honest Jen was about how we arrive at the layouts were shooting for. It’s a ton of playing with the possible values and employing a little trial and error. Happy accidents abound! But there is a lot to know about the different sizing values and placement possibilties of grid, so the more you know the more you can play. While playing, the layout stuff in Firefox DevTools is your best bet.
The idea is that even though brainstorm sessions are supposed to be judgment-free, they never are. Bad ideas are meant to be bad, so the worst you can do is have a good idea. Even better, starting with good ideas is problematic in that it’s easy to get attached to an idea too early, whereas bad ideas allow more freedom to jump through ideation space and land on better ideas.
Scott Jehl mentioned a fascinating idea where you can get the benefits of inlining code and caching files at the same time. That’s useful for stuff we’ve gotten used to seeing inlined, like critical CSS. But you know what else is awesome to inline? SVG icon systems. Scott covered the idea in his talk, but I wanted to see if it I could give it a crack myself.
The idea is that a fresh page visit inlines the icons, but also tosses them in cache. Then other pages can <svg><use> them out of the cache.
Here’s my demo page. It’s not really production-ready. For example, you’d probably want to do another pass where you Ajax for the icons and inject them by replacing the <use> so that everywhere is actually using inline <svg> the same way. Plus, a server-side system would be ideal to display them either way depending on whether the cache is present or not.
I’ll be there in Seattle for the kickoff, giving a talk about how to think like a front-end developer. I’ve been working on it for ages, and I think I have a talk ready that helps set the stage for where we are at in the world of front-end development, through the lens of tons of other front-end developers I admire in this industry. I hope it’ll be an entertaining romp through all their minds and how they think.